Piracicaba: Juan Bautista Torres vs Joaquin Aguilar

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

The real-world event is the men’s singles tennis match between Juan Bautista Torres and Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo at the Piracicaba Challenger, originally set for 25 June 2026 on clay in Brazil’s 1/8-finals. The match has already concluded, with Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo winning 6–3, 6–4 in the Round of 32, meaning Torres did not advance to face him again as implied by the market’s 100% YES probability for Torres advancing[2][3]. This discrepancy mirrors past cases where prediction markets misaligned with actual tournament progression, such as when conditional orders failed to account for early-round exits in ATP Challenger events, leading to automatic fair-price settlements instead of binary outcomes[4].

Traders should monitor official ATP Tour updates and tournament draw confirmations to verify whether the match was rescheduled or misreported, as delays beyond seven days without a winner trigger a 50–50 resolution[4]. Recent coverage from TennisTonic confirms this was a first-time H2H encounter in the second round, with Aguilar Cardozo emerging as the victor, suggesting the market’s framing may be based on outdated or erroneous scheduling data[8]. For programmatic approaches, conditional bots must cross-reference live score feeds (e.g., Flashscore, Sofascore) with market rules to avoid executing trades on non-existent future matches, ensuring alerts only activate when a ball is played and a winner is determined[1][6].

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Polymarket Review UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket Review UK is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on Polymarket Review UK?

Zero. Polymarket Review UK routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.