FC CFR 1907 Cluj vs. FC Argeș Pitești

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

CFR Cluj face FC Argeș Pitești in the Romanian SuperLiga with the market currently priced at 0% YES, so the practical reading is that traders are treating a non-result as effectively settled rather than as a live football event. For a programmatic workflow, that means the first check is whether the contract is already resolved by the exchange’s own timestamping and settlement logic, then whether any late data feed update, official score correction, or void condition could still change outcome status before the 17:30 UTC window closes.

Historically, CFR Cluj have been the stronger side in this matchup. FootyStats lists CFR with 10 wins from the last 13 meetings, while SportsGambler notes they are unbeaten in 10 home matches at Stadionul Dr. Constantin Rădulescu, with eight wins and two draws, conceding only 0.70 goals per game. Argeș, by contrast, have struggled away recently, with no win in three straight on the road and only four victories in their last 10 away fixtures. That profile is useful if you are comparing this market with similar late-stage football contracts, where home dominance and H2H history usually anchor pre-kickoff pricing unless the market has already crossed into post-match settlement.

The near-term catalysts are operational rather than tactical: confirmed line-ups, any late team news, and whether the listed fixture times align across data providers. FotMob had predicted elevens available close to kick-off, and multiple sources still showed the match scheduled for 22 May. For a bot or copy-trading setup, the relevant triggers are official kickoff confirmation, goal/VAR event updates, and settlement feed messages from the venue or market venue, since a 0% YES price often reflects completed or stale state rather than live uncertainty.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.