Who will attend the next US x Iran diplomatic meeting?

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

The next US–Iran diplomatic meeting would be a direct, official encounter between authorised representatives of Washington and Tehran, not a mediated channel or back-channel contact. That distinction matters for settlement: a market like this only pays on a deliberately scheduled meeting where the named person is physically present in an official negotiating capacity, so traders using scripts or conditional orders need to filter out press encounters, multilateral sidelines, and indirect talks.

Historically, direct US–Iran diplomacy is rare and tends to cluster around acute pressure points. The record includes senior-level discussions at the UN in 1998, a new round of formal talks in Oman in April 2025 led by Steve Witkoff and Abbas Araghchi, and further indirect talks in Muscat in February 2026 mediated by Oman. More recently, reporting said the US and Iran agreed on 14 June 2026 to halt hostilities and use mediation by Pakistan and Qatar as a bridge towards a longer settlement, which suggests the odds of some form of engagement are higher than the market’s current 0% implies, even if the exact attendee remains uncertain.[1][2][3]

For traders, the key catalysts are official read-outs from the US State Department, Iran’s Foreign Ministry, and the mediator governments, plus any confirmed travel, venue bookings, or joint statements. A practical approach is to watch for a named delegate appearing in an itinerary or pool report, because that is usually the cleanest pre-trade signal before headlines move. If no direct bilateral meeting is announced, the market can still resolve No even after ceasefire diplomacy, since mediated contacts do not qualify under the description.[2][3][4]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Polymarket Review UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket Review UK is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on Polymarket Review UK?

Zero. Polymarket Review UK routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Polymarket Review UK triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.