Strait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by end of June?

Platform comparison

Market context

The Strait of Hormuz handles roughly one-third of global seaborne oil trade, making vessel transit volumes a direct proxy for regional stability and energy market function. A 7-day moving average of 60 daily transit calls would represent a return to pre-disruption baseline traffic; the metric has fallen sharply since mid-2024 following escalations in Yemen-based Houthi attacks on shipping and subsequent coalition responses. Recovery to normal hinges on either a sustained ceasefire in the Red Sea theatre or a shift in threat perception that allows insurers and operators to resume standard routing without premium risk assessments.

Historical precedent suggests recovery timelines vary widely. The 2019 tanker attacks near the strait caused temporary routing diversification but normalised within weeks once naval presence stabilised. Conversely, the 2022 Ukraine-driven energy shock produced structural changes in shipping patterns that persisted for months. Current conditions differ: the Houthi campaign remains active and explicitly tied to geopolitical demands, meaning technical security improvements alone may not restore confidence. IMF Portwatch data lags by 2–3 days, requiring traders to monitor raw AIS feeds or port authority announcements for leading signals.

Watch for three catalysts: formal ceasefire announcements from UN mediators (next scheduled talks early 2026), insurance premium reductions published by Lloyd's Market Association, and statements from major oil majors regarding tanker deployment. A trader automating this market would benefit from conditional order logic tied to Reuters or Bloomberg news feeds flagging Houthi operational pauses, since the IMF threshold itself will resolve only after sustained normalisation is already underway. The 19% probability reflects the market's assessment that six months remains insufficient for full confidence restoration given current trajectory.

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Polymarket Review UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Polymarket Review UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket Review UK is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What does it cost to trade on Polymarket Review UK?

Zero. Polymarket Review UK routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.