Tunisia vs. Japan - Exact Score

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Tunisia’s group-stage meeting with Japan was settled in 90 minutes, and the available match coverage points to a **4-0 Japan win**, with Ayase Ueda scoring a brace and Japan keeping a clean sheet. That matters for score markets because the contract resolves on the exact regulation-time result only, so a single high-margin outcome can collapse a broad set of low-probability scorelines into a near-certain *Any Other Score* bucket unless the listed grid explicitly includes 4-0.[1][3][5]

For traders using bots, conditional orders, or copy-trading rules, the key historical lens is the teams’ prior head-to-head profile: Japan have won three of the four recorded meetings, with Tunisia winning once, and the overall series has been low-scoring relative to many World Cup fixtures.[8] In exact-score markets, that kind of sparse comparison set usually favours programmatic pricing models that weight shutout wins and modest scorelines more heavily than draw-heavy football priors, while still leaving room for variance because World Cup fixtures are more sensitive to lineup rotation and tournament state than friendlies.[8][9]

The main catalysts to watch are the official match feed, referee-added time, and any post-match correction to the final score line, because settlement depends only on the final 90-minute score and ignores extra time and penalties.[1][2] Market repricing tends to happen fastest when broadcast highlights or live score pages confirm a decisive result, so a power-user workflow would poll the official boxscore, compare it against the market’s enumerated score list, and only then trigger any automated close-out or hedge logic.[1][2][5]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Polymarket Review UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Polymarket Review UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

What does it cost to trade on Polymarket Review UK?

Zero. Polymarket Review UK routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Polymarket Review UK triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.