Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Polymarket Review UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Trade this market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Trade this market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Trade this market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Trade this market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Trade this market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Game 1 Winner | 100% |
| Match Winner | 100% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 100% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Game 2 Winner | 0% |
| Game Handicap: KT.C (-1.5) vs DN SOOPers Challengers (+1.5) | 0% |
Market context
KT Rolster Challengers’ BO3 against DN SOOPers Challengers is the relevant event here, and the market is effectively asking whether KT win the series outright. The crowd-implied 100% YES suggests the contract is already priced as a near-certain KT result, so the practical task for a programme or bot is not discovery but confirmation: check that the scheduled series is actually live, that the correct team names map to the contract, and that no late venue or format change has altered the settlement path. The market description is clear that a KT series win resolves to YES, while cancellation, an unplayed fixture, or an unresolved delay pushes it away from a normal result.
The historical frame points in the same direction. KT Rolster Challengers beat DN SOOPers Challengers 2-0 in their April meeting in the same league phase, and earlier head-to-head records also lean KT’s way, which helps explain why traders may have treated the rematch as one-sided.[1][7][8] Comparable LCK CL markets with repeat match-ups between the same academy sides often price heavily towards the team that has already won the prior best-of-three, especially when the earlier series was controlled rather than close. In a conditional-order workflow, that kind of setup usually means watching for any sudden reversal in team sheets, rather than trying to re-price the favourite from scratch.
The catalysts to monitor are mechanical rather than narrative: official start time, whether the BO3 remains on the July 31 schedule, and whether the league page or match tracker updates line-up or postponement status before the settlement window closes.[12] If the series slips past the 7-day delay threshold, or never begins, the contract’s resolution logic changes materially; a bot should therefore poll the fixture state and not rely solely on the headline probability. Recent listings from market and match trackers still show the fixture as a best-of-three in the LCK Challengers League, so the main risk is execution timing, not uncertainty over the pairing itself.[5][12]
Methodology
This page reviews LoL: KT Rolster Challengers vs DN SOOPers Challengers (BO3) - LCK Challengers League Rounds 3-4 Challenge Group across five venues. The live probability is the Polymarket mid-price, sourced directly from the on-chain Polygon order book; the comparison columns benchmark each venue on fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Polymarket Review UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Polymarket Review UK. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade LoL: KT Rolster Challengers vs DN SOOPers Challenger… on Polymarket Review UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →