Counter-Strike: Rune Eaters vs Bushido Wildcats (BO3) - CCT Europe Closed Qualifier: Series#3 Group D

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Rune Eaters are due to play Bushido Wildcats in a best-of-three CS2 match in CCT Europe Series #3 Group D. The key practical point for a market reader is that this is a discrete head-to-head with a short settlement horizon, so the main binary is whether the series is actually completed before the cutoff. Historical framing here is thin rather than rich: public previews place Bushido Wildcats as the stronger side, with Strafe showing roughly 79.9% of votes for Bushido and Rune Eaters on a poor recent run, including just one win in their last five. In a programmatic workflow, that kind of crowd split is useful as a baseline, but it should be treated as soft signal rather than price discovery, particularly when the market is already at 100% YES.

The main catalysts to monitor are schedule integrity and whether the match starts, pauses, or is pushed back inside the settlement window. Dust2.us listed the fixture for 21 May at 10:00 AM local server time, while Sofascore and Strafe both show a later start around 17:00 UTC, so timestamp reconciliation matters if you are automating alerts or conditional orders. Liquipedia’s group-stage format confirms these are Bo3 group matches, which lowers draw risk versus a single map but increases exposure to delays and technical pauses. Bovada’s posted handicap lines also imply a live market expectation that Bushido should be favoured, so any change in team line-up, match order, or official reschedule notice would be the main trigger to reassess the state path to settlement.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reviews Counter-Strike: Rune Eaters vs Bushido Wildcats (BO3) - CCT Europe Closed Qualifier: Series#3 Group D across five venues. We show live odds for Polymarket-based markets (sourced from the Polygon order book); for other venues we list platform attributes, since the comparable contracts are not exposed via a public API on every venue. Every CTA points at PolyGram — the application we operate, where you trade directly against the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.