Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Polymarket Review UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Trade this market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Trade this market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Trade this market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Trade this market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Trade this market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Match Winner | 100% |
| O/U 3.5 Games | 100% |
| Map Handicap: ICE (-1.5) vs Acend (+1.5) | 100% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 100% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 100% |
| Map 2 Winner | 100% |
| Map 3 Winner | 100% |
| Map 4 Winner | 100% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: Inner Circle Esports (-3.5) vs Acend (+3.5) | 100% |
| Map 5 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 50% |
| O/U 4.5 Games | 0% |
| Map Handicap: ICE (-2.5) vs Acend (+2.5) | 0% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 0% |
| Map 4 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Winner | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Inner Circle Esports (-3.5) vs Acend (+3.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 0% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Inner Circle Esports (-6.5) vs Acend (+6.5) | 0% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 30.5 | 0% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: Acend (-6.5) vs Inner Circle Esports (+6.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Inner Circle Esports (-6.5) vs Acend (+6.5) | 0% |
| Map Handicap: ACE (-1.5) vs Inner Circle Esports (+1.5) | 0% |
| Map Handicap: ACE (-2.5) vs Inner Circle Esports (+2.5) | 0% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Inner Circle Esports (-3.5) vs Acend (+3.5) | 0% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 27.5 | 0% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: Acend (-3.5) vs Inner Circle Esports (+3.5) | 0% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: Inner Circle Esports (-6.5) vs Acend (+6.5) | 0% |
Market context
The underlying event is the Counter-Strike 2 Grand Final between Inner Circle Esports and Acend at the Digital Crusade Super DraculaN Season 1, a $150k LAN tournament in Bucharest scheduled for 28 June 2026. Inner Circle, ranked 42 globally, faces Acend, ranked 59, in a BO5 final where the winner claims the title and the market resolves to "Inner Circle Esports" [4][5].
Historically, 100% crowd-implied probabilities in esports finals often signal a decisive prior performance rather than an absolute certainty, as seen when Acend advanced to the Upper Bracket Semi-Finals by defeating GamerLegion 2-1 in a tight BO3, while Inner Circle secured their spot with a dominant 2-0 sweep over AM [1][2]. In such cases, the market reflects the momentum of the stronger team, yet conditional orders must account for the volatility inherent in LAN finals where a single map loss can shift the outcome, as evidenced by Kalshi’s 0% probability for Inner Circle winning map 3 in a related match [3].
Traders should monitor the official tournament schedule for any delays beyond seven days, which would trigger a 50-50 resolution, and watch for announcements regarding team roster changes or map veto dependencies that could alter the competitive landscape [6]. Recent coverage from cs2live confirms the finals are set as a BO5, meaning the match could extend to five maps, increasing the window for unexpected shifts in momentum [5]. Programmatic approaches should integrate real-time score feeds from Sofascore to execute conditional orders based on map outcomes, ensuring positions are adjusted dynamically as the match progresses [6].
Methodology
This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote, four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Polymarket Review UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Counter-Strike: Inner Circle Esports vs Acend (BO5) … on Polymarket Review UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →