🎁 New traders: 100% Deposit Match up to $500 · 0% fees · instant USDC payoutsClaim it →
Skip to main content
HomeGuideCryptoMarketsBlogGet started →

Counter-Strike: FOKUS vs CYBERSHOKE Esports (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 3: Closed Qualifier Playoffs

How the prediction-market book is pricing "Counter-Strike: FOKUS vs CYBERSHOKE Esports (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 3: Closed Qualifier Playoffs" right now, with a side-by-side platform comparison and zero-fee CTAs.

100% YES 0% NO Volume: $269K Closes: 20 Jun 2026
Trade on Polymarket Review UK →
Counter-Strike: FOKUS vs CYBERSHOKE Esports (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 3: Closed Qualifier Playoffs

Platform comparison

PlatformYES oddsNO oddsFeeKYCSettlement
Polymarket Review UK Pick
polygram.ink
100% 0% 0% (USDC on-chain) No-KYC up to $1,500 USDC, auto via UMA oracle Open on Polymarket Review UK →
Polymarket
polymarket.com
100% 0% 0% Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU USDC, on-chain Open on Polymarket Review UK →
Kalshi
kalshi.com
Up to 7% per trade US-only, KYC required USD Open on Polymarket Review UK →
Betfair Exchange
betfair.com
2-5% commission Full KYC from first trade GBP / EUR Open on Polymarket Review UK →
Manifold Markets
manifold.markets
Play-money (mana) None — play-money Mana (no cash-out) Open on Polymarket Review UK →

Live odds for Polymarket-based markets come from the Polygon order book. Non-Polymarket venues show attributes only; clicking any row opens the market on Polymarket Review UK.

Active sub-markets

Match Winner100% FOKUS0% CYBERSHOKE Esports
O/U 2.5 Games100% Over0% Under
Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.50% Over100% Under
Map 1 Rounds Handicap: FOKUS (-3.5) vs CYBERSHOKE Esports (+3.5)100% FOKUS0% CYBERSHOKE Esports
Map 2 Winner0% FOKUS100% CYBERSHOKE Esports
Map Handicap: FOKUS (-1.5) vs CYBERSHOKE Esports (+1.5)0% FOKUS100% CYBERSHOKE Esports

Market context

FOKUS and CYBERSHOKE Esports are meeting in a best-of-three quarterfinal in the Stake Ranked Episode 3 closed qualifier playoffs, a format where **map vetoes** and the third map, if needed, often matter as much as raw team strength. With the market already pricing a **100% YES** outcome, a programmatic trader would normally treat it as a settlement-risk check rather than a directional edge: verify the official match page, watch for lineup confirmation, and track whether the series actually starts on schedule, since the contract only pays out cleanly if there is a winner within the allowed window.

The nearest useful comparables are the teams’ broader recent records and head-to-head context rather than any single isolated result. Sofascore lists prior H2H meetings for this pairing, while CYBERSHOKE’s recent form on EGamersWorld is middling at **40% wins over the last five matches** and **50% over the last ten**, which is the kind of profile that usually supports volatility rather than certainty.[1][2] That matters because in BO3 esports markets, heavy crowd consensus can reflect stale expectations from one-sided bracket assumptions, especially when the underlying series is not yet live or has already been delayed.

For a tooling-driven approach, the key catalysts are straightforward: the tournament admin’s schedule, any delay notices, roster changes, and whether the match page flips from scheduled to live on the expected day. GosuGamers and HLTV-linked listings place the match in the Stake Ranked Episode 3 bracket on 20 June, which means a trader using alerts, bots, or conditional orders would typically watch for official start-time changes, map one completion, and any sign the series is being postponed beyond the market’s seven-day fallback clause.[3][5] If the match is scratched entirely or delayed past the settlement limit, the contract moves away from a normal team result and towards 50-50 resolution.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

We track Counter-Strike: FOKUS vs CYBERSHOKE Esports (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 3: Closed Qualifier Playoffs on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
On Polymarket Review UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
How does resolution work?
Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
How fast are USDC deposits?
Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
Do I need to KYC for this market?
Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Polymarket Review UK triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.
and

Trade Counter-Strike: FOKUS vs CYBERSHOKE Esports (BO3) - … on Polymarket Review UK

Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.

Trade on Polymarket Review UK →